Bjgp open
The British Journal of General Practice is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal for general practitioners and primary care researchers, bjgp open. It was renamed Journal of the College of General Practitioners in from Journal of the Royal College of Bjgp open Practitionersbefore obtaining its current name in
Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. Welcome to BJGP Open , our new open access, online-only journal of primary care research, practice, and policy. BJGP Open has original, high-quality, peer-reviewed primary care research at its core, complemented by reviews, case studies, clinical reports, policy analysis, and the opportunity for discussion and debate. For some time we have been aware that the BJGP receives far more high quality original material that it can publish: less than one in four Research articles is accepted, pressure on the non-Research sections of the Journal is intense, and many of the Research articles that we decline are of good scientific quality. The same goes for articles submitted to other sections of the Journal. Primary care everywhere needs to continue to build an evidence base for health care and clinical practice, and to continue to make its political and health policy arguments in all health systems.
Bjgp open
.
Retrieved BJGP Open has original, high-quality, peer-reviewed primary care research at its core, complemented by reviews, case studies, clinical reports, policy analysis, and the bjgp open for discussion and debate. Peer-reviewed publication is an important means of achieving this.
.
Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. As editors we have received a vast array of wonderful and interesting manuscripts. These have spanned diverse subject matters and locations from gestational diabetes in Norway to workforce retention in South Africa. In this editorial, we reflect on the articles that have resonated most with our readership, as highlighted by our recent list of Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of The past few years have seen unprecedented change in how we consult in primary care. Several of our articles reflect the importance of human interaction, a foundation of our specialty, which was heavily impacted both professionally and personally by the pandemic. The impersonal nature of remote consulting also meant that rapport and relationship building was challenging. Alongside traditional approaches to symptom identification and treatment, and facilitation of access to specialist services where needed, human interaction was once again highlighted, with GPs demonstrating concern, empathy, and understanding being key to optimal care. How effectively this can be done remotely is unclear.
Bjgp open
Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. Next month will see the launch of BJGP Open , our new open access, online-only journal of primary care research, practice, and policy. BJGP Open will have original, high-quality, peer-reviewed primary care research at its core, complemented by case studies, clinical reports, policy analysis, and the opportunity for discussion and debate. For some time we have been aware that the BJGP receives far more high quality original material that it can publish: less than one in four research articles is accepted, pressure on the non-research sections of the Journal is intense, and many of the research articles that we decline are of good scientific quality. The same goes for articles submitted to other sections of the Journal. Primary care everywhere needs to continue to build an evidence base for health care and clinical practice, and to continue to make its political and health policy arguments in all health systems. Peer-reviewed publication is an important means of achieving this. The same is true for education and training in general practice and primary care, and we will welcome original observations and analysis in these fields.
Tonicamille
The same goes for articles submitted to other sections of the Journal. Archived from the original Microsoft Excel on The site is secure. Academic journal. Welcome to BJGP Open , our new open access, online-only journal of primary care research, practice, and policy. Open access publishing is now an established and important part of the medical publication landscape, and BJGP Open will be an open-access only journal, which means that Article Processing Charges will be applied and paid by authors, their institutions, or their research funders. Thomson Reuters. BJGP Open has original, high-quality, peer-reviewed primary care research at its core, complemented by reviews, case studies, clinical reports, policy analysis, and the opportunity for discussion and debate. Download as PDF Printable version. NLM Catalog. Retrieved British Journal of General Practice. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Read Edit View history.
.
The same is true for education and training in general practice and primary care, and we will welcome original observations and analysis in these fields. We hope that, in future issues of BJGP Open , the Research section will contain, in addition to original clinical and primary healthcare research, protocols for trials and other planned research studies, and reports of well-conducted educational research. Received Oct 26; Accepted Oct Article Talk. BJGP Open has original, high-quality, peer-reviewed primary care research at its core, complemented by reviews, case studies, clinical reports, policy analysis, and the opportunity for discussion and debate. BJGP Open will be applying for indexing in PubMed as soon as the first 25 peer-reviewed articles have been published, but — as with all new journals — will need to earn its impact factor. We hope that we can develop other, more innovative features in our new Journal. According to the Journal Citation Reports , it has a impact factor of 6. Retrieved Contents move to sidebar hide. Published online Jan 9. Notes Provenance Freely submitted; not externally peer reviewed. Open access. June Former name s.
I congratulate, an excellent idea
In it something is and it is excellent idea. I support you.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.