Crisostomo v ca

CA, GR No. Menor went to her aunt's residence on June crisostomo v ca, - a Wednesday - to deliver petitioner's travel documents and plane tickets. Petitioner, in turn, gave Menor the full payment for the package tour. Menor then told her to be at the Ninoy Aquino.

In May , petitioner Estela L. Petitioner, in turn, gave Menor the full payment for the package tour. Without checking her travel documents, petitioner went to NAIA on Saturday, June 15, , to take the flight for the first leg of her journey from Manila to Hongkong. She learned that her plane ticket was for the flight scheduled on June 14, She thus called up Menor to complain.

Crisostomo v ca

This is a petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals dated July 15, , the dispositive portion of which reads:. The questioned Orders and writs directing 1 "reinstatement" of respondent Isabelo T. Crisostomo to the position of "President of the Polytechnic University of the Philippines", and 2 payment of "salaries and benefits" which said respondent failed to receive during his suspension insofar as such payment includes those accruing after the abolition of the PCC and its transfer to the PUP, are hereby set aside. Accordingly, further proceedings consistent with this decision may be taken by the court a quo to determine the correct amounts due and payable to said respondent by the said university. During his incumbency as president of the PCC, two administrative cases were filed against petitioner for illegal use of government vehicles, misappropriation of construction materials belonging to the college, oppression and harassment, grave misconduct, nepotism and dishonesty. The administrative cases, which were filed with the Office of the President, were subsequently referred to the Office of the Solicitor General for investigation. Charges of violations of R. On June 14, , three 3 informations for violation of Sec. The informations alleged that he appropriated for himself a bahay kubo , which was intended for the College, and construction materials worth P, Petitioner was also accused of using a driver of the College as his personal and family driver. On October 22, , petitioner was preventively suspended from office pursuant to R. In his place Dr.

This being so, she is not entitled to any form of damages.

A travel agency is not an entity engaged in the business of transporting either passengers or goods and is therefore, neither a private nor a common carrier. Respondent did not undertake to transport petitioner from one place to another since its covenant with its customers is simply to make travel arrangements in their behalf. Respondents services as a travel agency include procuring tickets and facilitating travel permits or visas as well as booking customers for tours. It is in this sense that the contract between the parties in this case was an ordinary one for services and not one of carriage. Petitioner Estela L. The booking fee was also waived because petitioners niece, Meriam Menor, was respondents ticketing manager. On June 12, , Menor went to her aunts residence to deliver petitioners travel documents and planen tickets.

What took place was a change in academic status of the educational institution, not in its corporate life. Hence the change in its name, the expansion of its curricular offerings, and the changes in its structure and organization. During incumbency as president following cases was filed against him:. It was subsequently referred to the Office of the Solicitor General for investigation. He was replaced by Dr.

Crisostomo v ca

CA, GR No. Menor went to her aunt's residence on June 12, - a Wednesday - to deliver petitioner's travel documents and plane tickets. Petitioner, in turn, gave Menor the full payment for the package tour.

Melonsclips

CA Facts Crisostomo v. Is this content inappropriate? Ochoa, Borilla. Garcia, members. Recovery of salaries and benefits was limited to those accruing from the time of petitioner's suspension until the conversion of the PCC to the PUP. It shall be composed of a Chairman and four 4 regular commissioners, one 1 of whom shall be designated as Vice-Chairman by the President. As already noted, R. Davide, Jr. Crisostomo Vs Court of Appeals. CA, GR No. Art Crisostomo v.

In May , petitioner Estela L.

Carousel Previous. Creation and Composition. It is thus not bound under the law to observe extraordinary diligence in the performance of its obligation, as petitioner claims. Search inside document. Hence the change in its name, the expansion of its curricular offerings, and the changes in its structure and organization. What is Scribd? Lastly, respondent maintained that the "British Pageant" was not a substitute for the package tour that petitioner missed. Respondent also properly booked petitioner for the tour, prepared the necessary documents and procured the plane tickets. American Ballast Et. Petitioner Estela L. Petitioner, in turn, gave Menor the full payment for the package tour. United States of America vs. She learned that her plane ticket was for the flight scheduled on June 14, Did you find this document useful?