Suzuki rf 900 review

But Suzuki delivered just that when it produced the RFR in the late 90s.

Do you feel the need, the need for speed? For a parts bin special, the RFR is surprisingly quick. Photo: cc-cycle. Welcome our 4 Sale series about interesting, unique or weird bikes for sale online. Note: This is not an advertisement. ADVrider is not affiliated in any way with either the seller or marketplace. Do you know of any unique bikes for sale?

Suzuki rf 900 review

The one major downfall the RFR had for many upon its release in was that most people simply did not like the way it looks. Some love it, most loathe it. But after you get past that first impression and ride thevery capable cc sports-tourer — opinions can change quickly. It fulfilled this role quite well and was a far superior package to the GSXR On its release the Japanese company had got a bit carried away with itself, advertising that the RFR styling was modelled off a stingray the designer had seen at an ocean aquarium…. The in-line four-cylinder engine was designed by Hiroshi Lio who also had a lot of input on the GSX-R series of engines. The 28 mm intake valves and 24 mm exhaust valves are also fairly small for the size of the engine, also for the same reason. I would be tempted to add a couple of teeth to the rear for some more zap as 5th gear is a tad long. The acceleration that the engine provides is great, easily the equal of many other bigger engined sportsbikes designed in The riding position while not an armchair ride, is appreciably more comfortable than the GSXR The bike does have a few vibes coming through the grips around the mark but these disappear when you pass The chassis is a good balance between comfort and fang modes. On standard settings I would say that its handling on your average back road is a match for just about anything else from its era. The frame itself is painted steel which is fairly rare these days, but does look a little classy and is a change from the polished alloy that we normally see. While not up to standards, the brakes are good for the era and perform their role adequately.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Weaknesses: Needs a few improvements to bring out the best. It's a pretty simple motorcycle, no fancy electronic gadgetry, not much that can go wrong or fail compared to many other bikes in its suzuki rf 900 review.

The RF is an extremely sporty-looking sports tourer with cc, bhp and a mile tank range. Get a bike Quote. Call us Ride Quality out of 5 stars. Engine out of 5 stars. Running Cost out of 5 stars.

But Suzuki delivered just that when it produced the RFR in the late 90s. A sporty sports-tourer, the Suzuki RFR delivered plenty of punch, decent handling, comfortable versatility and, er, odd styling. Old hat today, but the Suzuki RFR is still excellent value. Steel perimeter frame helped keep costs of the Suzuki RFR down, used the engine as a stressed member and provided taut and surefooted handling with a short wheelbase and quick steering geometry. Over-hard suspension springs and damping rates can cause some jarring, but once loaded up with a pillion and some luggage the rear of the Suzuki RFR starts to work much better.

Suzuki rf 900 review

So what was wrong with it? Nothing if you read the launch reports from Back then the press of the day were generally positive about a bike when ridden solo, but when you put it back to back with its peers, it was then that they would suffer in comparison. This gave it useful torque but a still-good top end of around mph. The beam frame showed up its sportier brethren the GSX-Rs in the handling stakes, even if the RF itself was never deemed that cool. At kg it was 18kg heavier than the Blade and had lazier steering geometry and a 17in front tyre even if it was lighter than the ZX-9R. So it was comfier, but not as cutting-edge as the Blade and the sportbike-mad buyers flocked away. So what was right with it?

Worksheet prime numbers

Summary of owners' reviews. Ride Quality out of 5 stars. Buying experience: Bought privately. Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage. Ride Quality 5 out of 5 stars It's smooth and takes corners well, it doesn't feel heavy Engine 5 out of 5 stars It's powerful enough to keep up with most other bikes within the speed limits. Yes, compared to modern bikes it is heavy but somehow lighter than gixer s! January 30, at pm. Had mine about a fortnight now, after many Kwakkers. Bought mine with 20k miles on the clock and yesterday it turned past 51k miles. Very strong initial bite, good feedback and powerful retardation. Top gear motorway casual drive or trash it a bit and smile. Not as well made but quicker in every way, handles fantastic ect, ect It seems quite good on fuel miles per tank, good for touring, better than my other bikes. MCNews covers all areas of interest for the motorcycling public including news, reviews and comprehensive racing coverage. See my overall review for ride quality.

Do you feel the need, the need for speed? For a parts bin special, the RFR is surprisingly quick.

The dashboard is well laid out, the bike has an old fashioned fuel tap, which is difficult to operate when riding. A ride through the canyons reveals more differences. At rpm you have really nice push! The comfort is OK and the 3 hour blast I took it on left me only a little tired. It's been more reliable than any other bike I've owned. So far, VERY impressed - plenty quick, build quality, contrary to opinions, seems to be quite good; and it's easy to work on - you can't say that about many modern bikes, can you! In terms of looks, it's one of those polarising love-it-or-hate-it designs. Watch out for ones that slip out of second gear - this is one of the very few common faults these bikes have, but one that's been looked after won't have it. What more do you really need? Turn signals moved to where the stock brake lights were? For the money, dollar for dollar, the best bike ever made! Old hat today, but the Suzuki RFR is still excellent value. A sporty sports-tourer, the Suzuki RFR delivered plenty of punch, decent handling, comfortable versatility and, er, odd styling.