Voat.co

By Adi Robertsona senior tech and voat.co editor focused on VR, voat.co, online platforms, and free expression. Adi has covered video games, biohacking, voat.co, and more for The Verge since Voat co-founder Justin Chastain announced the pending closure yesterday, saying the site had run out of money after an investor defaulted voat.co their contract in March. Voat was founded in and hosted Reddit-like forums with minimal moderation.

Registered users could then vote on these submissions. Content entries were organized by areas of interest called "subverses". Voat was a site which hosted aggregated content and discussion forums. According to Wired , Voat was "aesthetically and functionally similar to Reddit. Unlike Reddit, Voat emphasized looser content restrictions and an ad-revenue sharing program. The name "Voat" is a play on the words 'goat' and 'vote'.

Voat.co

Voat was founded as a neutral free-speech platform. After alt-right extremists were booted off reddit, they found a new home there. Kind of like that "paradox of intolerance" meme. Free speech platforms usually end up becoming extremist platforms. I remember going on voat a couple years ago and the front page was filled with anti-Semitic and white nationalist propaganda, and racial slurs were everywhere. Even non-political subverses had an alt-right tinge. It was truly the culture that dominated the site. AnthonyMouse on Dec 22, parent next [—]. Reddit, in its earlier days, was never dominated by the Voat contingent. They were there, but they were far less extreme there than they were on Voat. And then whenever they would post rank inaccuracies, there were clearer-minded people to point out why they were wrong, in the same place where the same people could see it. But it doesn't work to have one popular platform which allows nearly everyone except for Those Deplorables and another that allows "everyone" but the only people with the incentive to move are the people being forcibly ejected from the popular one. Because witch hunts are bad, but if there is a place that owes its existence solely to a policy of not having witch hunts, it's going to be full of witches. So the answer has to be to stop the witch hunts in the places where everybody else already is. Got to be honest, bro, I don't really care to sacrifice for "the good of society" or whatever.

I am wary of continuing to feed the troll, voat.co, but you voat.co that there's a difference of kind between a communist and a Stalinist, yes?

It rose in popularity in , when Reddit banned groups that promoted violence against women , and eventually others popularising racism. Since then, the website had reportedly been host to other antisemitic and racist content, and had apparently been approached by an unnamed US agency due to the large quantity of death threats made on the platform. More recently, the site was a gateway to QAnon conspiracy theorists , who claim without any evidence that there is a covert operation to oust President Trump and that there is a secret sect of elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles in government, business and the media. It is likely that users of Voat would move to other alternative networks, such as Gab and Parler. Gab is infamous for being host to antisemitic conspiracy theories from the Pittsburgh shooter, who is accused of killing 11 Jewish people at the Tree of Life synagogue in Parler describes itself as "unbiased social media focused on real user experiences and engagement" that allows "free expression without violence and no censorship.

Registered users could then vote on these submissions. Content entries were organized by areas of interest called "subverses". Voat was a site which hosted aggregated content and discussion forums. According to Wired , Voat was "aesthetically and functionally similar to Reddit. Unlike Reddit, Voat emphasized looser content restrictions and an ad-revenue sharing program. The name "Voat" is a play on the words 'goat' and 'vote'. Colo explained in a post announcing the incorporation that this was because "Switzerland seemed like a great option in the beginning, but when it comes to freedom of speech, the main idea behind Voat, U. Colo was replaced as CEO by Chastain.

Voat.co

Reddit alternative Voat shut down on Christmas Day, citing a lack of operational funding, and casting doubt on the abilities of other similar almost-anything-goes, "free speech" platforms to stay online in the long run. Investment dried up in March , he explained. Voat first launched in as a smaller Reddit alternative dedicated to "free speech," including explicit hate speech, extreme right-wing content, racism, and other content limited or prohibited on other sites. It gained traction in , when Reddit finally banned several explicitly racist subreddits from its platform in a bid to limit harassment, and some discontented Reddit users decided to migrate over. In the middle of , Voat's web host, Host Europe, suspended service to the platform, saying, "we will not tolerate any form of illegal right-wing extremist content and we explicitly distance ourselves from this. PayPal also suspended Voat's account in , amid allegations the platform was hosting sexually explicit images of minors. Voat removed several forums in the wake of the suspension, including the ones dedicated to "jailbait," and switched to accepting donations in digital currencies such as bitcoin. By , another wave of users booted off other platforms had migrated to Voat: QAnon adherents.

Sprint auto parts salisbury sa

How to build a strawman I'm not interested in debating or trolling at all. It's a good place for a laugh every now and then, if you can stomach the hate. Early on it was very science, tech, and liberal. But I'm putting that in to be generous, I don't think I'm ever seen these topics discussed in good faith. You have to scroll way down to see any negative notions. In order to have a good community, you need a form of censorship, whether through moderation, spam detection, voting systems, and so on. Reddit has plenty of discussion about violently overthrowing, imprisoning or murdering anyone anyone who is currently "too rich" like Jeff Bezos. Just don't go to the nazi party party. And it wasn't even the worst subreddit. This should be done, however, only to preserve equal liberty — i.

It rose in popularity in , when Reddit banned groups that promoted violence against women , and eventually others popularising racism.

It's an Unholy Mess". Archived from the original on September 29, Not only are these viewpoints, which you claim can only be argued in bad faith, supported by empirical evidence, but the people who dare to support them publicly are risking social and financial ruin. Most people who say we should discuss politics more seem to mean that we should affirm the local viewpoint. I want them outside. We have to worry about Stalinists as well as Nazis though, because Stalin killed more people than Hitler. It'll get worse. Back then of course being a moderator was seen as a thankless service to the community rather than some censoring devil. Retrieved July 9, Painting a group as an unchecked evil means you don't have to tell anyone specifically they should commit violence, but, it's hard to be surprised if they come to that conclusion. How did they take the election loss? I find these types of strawman confusing. It was chosen as "subreddit of the year" in and the subreddit was the second most searched term on Reddit[2]. If you've seen a neighboring store burned you feel one way, if you've seen a neighbor threatened you feel another. No sense of irony in claiming that a counterargument is the slippery slope fallacy?