Why was frodo so resistant to the ring

The hobbits of Middle-earth in Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings are impressively resistant to being fully corrupted by Sauron's One Ring, but why is this?

Frodo Baggins is one of the most powerless beings in the entirety of Middle-earth, yet he's also the one who carries the heaviest burden and the most essential object in The Lord of the Rings : the One Ring. Frodo's lack of classic heroism makes him the perfect master to harness the power of the Ring and destroy it without succumbing entirely to its dominance. Frodo's tragic journey from the Shire to Mordor is one of the most memorable in pop culture because his traits don't resemble any of the heroes from the most famous franchises. Frodo isn't strong, athletic or a descendant of kings -- he's just a Hobbit who wants to live peacefully. He's also a character whom the audience can relate to, considering there is nothing special about him besides his overwhelming courage and resilience. In The Lord of the Rings , power doesn't correlate to heroism, as Frodo represents by being the only one capable of carrying the Ring to Mordor. Without Frodo, the consequences of the meeting could have been devastating.

Why was frodo so resistant to the ring

The titular Ring in The Lord of the Rings is one of the most complex and interesting magical items in film or literature. The way that it affects the nature of its owner is fascinating, and it's equally intriguing to see how it affects everyone else around it as well. The Ring corrupts, and though there are some who can handle and resist its power better than others, it always seems to fundamentally change anyone who touches it in the end. Frodo and Gollum are two characters who come under the influence of the Ring, with Frodo being resistant at first and slowly falling to the Ring's will, and Gollum being an extreme example of what could happen if one were to be in possession of the Ring for too long. That being said, there are a few characters who hold onto the Ring for a period of time and yet are able to give it up freely, namely Bilbo and Sam. Because Bilbo has been in possession of the Ring for so many years, it seems strange that he is able to give it up as easily as he does at the beginning of the story. Sam's case is interesting because it doesn't seem as if the Ring really affects him at all, despite being near it for a large portion of the story, and actually holding onto it at one point though to be fair, it was for a very short amount of time. What is it about these two Hobbits in particular that makes them so resilient against the effects of The One Ring? An argument for Sam's ability to give up the Ring is that he only held onto it for a short time. However, Gollum was almost instantly corrupted by the Ring when he initially came upon it. He was so overwhelmed by it that he killed Deagol in order to protect the Ring and keep it for himself. Additionally, Bilbo hung onto the Ring for quite a long time before he eventually gave it up, which also refutes the theory that the Ring's corruption lies within a certain time period. There is an argument to be made that for both Hobbits, their innate goodness was what kept them from being completely overtaken by the Ring's power, but is that all? It may have something to do with the intent of the Ring-bearer, and what their ultimate goal with the Ring is. Bilbo was in possession of the Ring for many years but only gave it up near the end of his personal journey, when he would not be in need of it.

He sneaks past Gollum and the goblins guarding the tunnels, but he has a chance to kill Gollum on his way out. In order to resist the will of the Ring, the mind of the person holding it must be very strong. Frodo's lack of classic heroism makes him the perfect master to harness the power of the Ring and destroy it without succumbing entirely to its dominance.

One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them. The words of fire etched on Frodo's golden ring reveal the Baggins' family heirloom to be the most powerful and evil object in all of Middle-earth, a physical embodiment of the worst that is thought and felt: cruelty, domination, greed. Yet the Ring's true nature normally lies hidden beneath a "quite plain" exterior, a simple band of pure gold that seems unmarked and unremarkable. As characters interact with this apparently innocuous trinket, their temptation to take and use the Ring reinscribes those fiery letters and illustrates the present, active, and dangerous power of the Ring. The powerful, such as Gandalf and Galadriel, desire to take the Ring, but they also fear the consequences of wielding its power.

Rather than trying to dominate the world by force as Morgoth did, he decided to play the long game and utilize his cunning. Through a lot of subterfuge, Sauron made Rings of Power, distributed them to the different races of Middle-earth and kept a master ring for himself. That One Ring was easily the most powerful object in the history of Middle-earth. The inherent power of the Ring was why all the Ring-bearers had so much trouble giving it up. One thing doesn't make sense, though.

Why was frodo so resistant to the ring

When Frodo begins his journey, he does not consider himself particularly heroic, but the job must be done and he is the only person available. Many times along the way, especially before he and Sam separate from the rest of the Fellowship, either he or one of the powerful individuals he encounters comment on his obvious lack of qualifications. He is not wise like Elrond; he is not valiant like Aragorn; his not powerful like Gandalf. In fact, he lacks all the usual features of heroism. He is only a hobbit, gifted with such pedestrian virtues as common sense, a good heart, and the determination to do his best. The first challenges to confront Frodo dramatize his inexperience. He is indecisive, delaying his departure from the Shire as long as possible even though he knows the task is urgent. He opts to risk the dangers of the Old Forest, nearly getting himself and his friends killed — twice. He behaves foolishly in Bree, drawing unnecessary attention to himself. And he gives in to the temptation to put on the Ring at Weathertop, making himself vulnerable to the Ringwraiths' attack.

Ubisoft club coins

Frodo is the hobbit that is corrupted the most next to Gollum and Bilbo, which is why he is unable to throw the Ring into the fire. Gollum and Saruman differ from the other characters in submitting willingly to an evil power; the effect, according to the scholar Patricia Spacks, is of gradual destruction, even when the character starts out mainly virtuous. The race of man is concerned with power and domination. All Gandalf needed to do was give the suggestion to Bilbo that he should give up the Ring, and he was able to do it because the Ring had already made the decision. The hero of The Lord of the Rings , contrary to the norm, needs to be as powerless as Frodo. Little does Frodo know, Bilbo's inheritance comes with much more than just a Hobbit hole. Adam Bede has been added to your Reading List! It corrupts, yes, but it also has the ability to shift things to its will. From the beginning of his journey, Frodo knows that nothing else matters -- destroying the Ring is the only purpose in his life, and there probably isn't going to be a return trip home. The One Ring is an evil sentient object that relies on its bearer to enhance its temptation. The Hunt for Gollum Born of Hope They view Tolkien's scheme as having five groups of three characters, each affected differently by power. The Ring fuels the desires of the one who wears it.

Frodo inherited the burden of the One Ring from his uncle Biblo. While Frodo doesn't make the likeliest of heroes on paper, that was J.

Frodo's lack of strength and relevancy makes him ideal to discreetly make his way to Mordor. On the other hand, Gandalf and Galadriel, for example, could become as powerful as Sauron and destroy Middle-earth. Plato argues that immoral life is no good as it corrupts one's soul. The corrupting effect of power in the book is not limited to the Ring. That immediate mood swing shows how the Ring casts an emotional pall over anyone who holds it. Their love of nature extends to their wardrobes, as they usually are dressed in earth tones like green or yellow. Production Peter Jackson's interpretation Picturing Tolkien. Frodo perfectly blends the simple-minded personality of a Hobbit and the adventurous mindset that Bilbo instills in him. Although similar in appearance to man, hobbits are actually about half the size of an average person, which is why they are referred to as halflings. Sam only held onto it while he thought Frodo was dead, and Bilbo simply stumbled upon it, and kept it by outwitting Gollum. Not even the elves or wizards are able to fully resist the draw of power or evil. He can hardly crawl the last miles until Sam must finally carry him up the slope of the mountain. Wielding power — especially the immense power of the Ring — can corrupt even the most wise and well-intentioned. Bilbo and Sam both came into possession of the Ring by taking it in a relatively peaceful manner. As for Sam, his resistance likely has to do with his innate goodness and loyalty.

0 thoughts on “Why was frodo so resistant to the ring

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *