Alina chan twitter

Thread Reader. Share this page! More info at Twitter Help.

Keep Current with Alina Chan. Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author! Practice here first or read more on our help page! This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story. Become Premium.

Alina chan twitter

If you're a human and see this, please ignore it. If you're a scraper, please click the link below :- Note that clicking the link below will block access to this site for 24 hours. I n January, as she watched the news about a novel virus spreading out of control in China, Alina Chan braced for a shutdown. Then she began to ramp down her projects in the lab, isolating her experimental cells from their cultures and freezing them in small tubes. As prepared as she was for the shutdown, though, she found herself unprepared for the frustration of being frozen out of work. She paced the walls of her tiny apartment feeling bored and useless. Chan has been a puzzle demon since childhood, which was precisely what she loved about her work—the chance to solve fiendishly difficult problems about how viruses operate and how, through gene therapy, they could be repurposed to help cure devastating genetic diseases. Staring out her window at the eerily quiet streets of her Inman Square neighborhood, she groaned at the thought that it could be months before she was at it again. Her mind wandered back to , when she was a teenager growing up in Singapore and the first SARS virus, a close relative of this coronavirus, appeared in Asia. That one had been relatively easy to corral. How had this virus come out of nowhere and shut down the planet? Why was it so different? Stuck at home, all she had to work with was her brain and her laptop. Maybe they were enough.

Instead, Trump-era investigators seemed to rely on tweeted evidence and sources who were not trained virologists. We don't know what happened in alina chan twitter the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The reaction of virologists and other specialists to Chan's hypothesis has been largely, but not exclusively, negative.

Alina Chan started asking questions in March She was chatting with friends on Facebook about the virus then spreading out of China. She thought it was strange that people were saying it had come out of a food market. She wondered why no one was admitting another possibility, which to her seemed very obvious: the outbreak might have been due to a lab accident. She had worked in a few labs and knew they were not perfect places.

E ver since the first reports of a coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, a megacity in central China, the origins of Covid have been steeped in controversy. Was Sars-CoV-2, to give the virus its official name, the result of a natural spillover event from animals to humans or was it the product of laboratory experimentation? Although most cases clustered around a seafood market that also sold wild animals, it did not escape the attention of western intelligence agencies that nine miles to the south lay the Wuhan Institute of Virology WIV. Nor that for many years researchers at the secure biosafety facility had been exploring caves in Yunnan, in southern China , in search of bats that harbour Sars-like viruses and isolating genetic material from their saliva, urine and faeces. The fact that the outbreak had begun in the same city as the WIV was too much of a coincidence to ignore. Alina Chan and Matt Ridley are similarly puzzled why, if the virus had a natural origin, it was first detected in Wuhan and not closer to Yunnan, miles to the south. The stakes could not be higher: if the virus was engineered in a Chinese lab and deliberately released on the world, it would amount to the crime of the century. Wisely, Chan and Ridley do not go that far. Ridley, a Conservative hereditary peer best known for his sceptical writings on climate change, and Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, have every right to scrutinise the evidence. Indeed, we now know their concerns were shared by several leading coronavirus experts who, at the time, publicly condemned suggestions of a non-natural origin and insisted the virus bore none of the hallmarks of being engineered.

Alina chan twitter

Alina Chan started asking questions in March She was chatting with friends on Facebook about the virus then spreading out of China. She thought it was strange that people were saying it had come out of a food market. She wondered why no one was admitting another possibility, which to her seemed very obvious: the outbreak might have been due to a lab accident. She had worked in a few labs and knew they were not perfect places. In fact, she had often been the one to speak up about what was wrong. Both Chan and Harvard have declined to comment on the details. But when she read it, she could already see a problem. For instance, a normal virus collected from bats in the wild, if brought to Wuhan, could have somehow slipped out.

Paris gare routière de roissypôle

That is what keeps Chan up at night—the possibility of new outbreaks in humans from the same source. The lack of a smoking gun in the genome is one reason why, over the first half of , the lab-accident theory mostly lived online, where it was pursued primarily by internet sleuths, some working under anonymous handles, who lacked credibility with mainstream scientists. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. Chan returned to Canada at 16 to attend the University of British Columbia for both her undergraduate degree and her PhD. US reseachers will likely freak out". Many of the people pushing the lab-origin theory are not making claims based on logic, but she presented her evidence. The good news? Adding a photocopier gene to mRNA vaccines could make them last longer and curb side effects. Canadian molecular biologist. Within days, a perfect opportunity came along when news broke that the coronavirus had jumped from humans to minks at European fur farms. And also more racism? Neither she nor Ridley would tell me how much the book had sold for. I can't say the same for the 4 Proximal Origin authors with regards to evidence of a lab origin. She returned to Canada after high school to study biochemistry and molecular biology at the University of British Columbia , where she earned a PhD. If you're a human and see this, please ignore it.

A local researcher has been pushing the United States to investigate the lab for more than a year.

The other six relate to allegedly suspicious behavior on the part of Chinese scientists, including the failure to mention the miners who died in and the furin site on the virus genome. He cited a variety of sources, including Chan. Some of the other papers, though, were strangely ambiguous about where their data was coming from, or how their genomes had been constructed. Numerous scientists have been publicly switching sides. Become Premium. She and Zhan posted a new preprint on bioRxiv dismantling the pangolin papers. Then she began to ramp down her projects in the lab, isolating her experimental cells from their cultures and freezing them in small tubes. This perplexed Chan. This Thread may be Removed Anytime! Very important. Klotz has estimated the chance of a pathogen escape from a BSL-4 lab at 0. In the meantime, the WIV has steadfastly denied any viral leak. These sleuths did have some success in one area.