Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

This article breaks down how the device fared in ios uiscrollview variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations, xiaomi 13 pro dxomark.

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. With an overall Camera score of , the Xiaomi 13T Pro ranked 8 points higher than the Xiaomi 13T, even though both phones are equipped with the same camera hardware. The differences in image quality were particularly visible in color rendering , in terms of white balance and skin tone rendering. This year, Xiaomi has shifted gears and equipped the 13T and 13T Pro lines with a Mediatek chipset, after several years of using Qualcomm chipsets for the T Pro lines.

Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Brightness adaptation was good in most conditions except indoors, where brightness was lower than its competitors. Screen readability diminished when the device was used under sunlight as details were lost, especially in dark areas. Both contrast and colors were well-managed on the device, particularly when watching HDR10 video content. But brightness adaptation to HDR10 content was low, compared with the adaptation of other devices, which feature 10 nits to 15 nits of more brightness. Xiaomi 13 Pro users might need to calibrate the brightness to get a more satisfying HDR10 rendering. When it comes to the video game experience, the device showed no frame mismatches, but ghost touches were frequent. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display. Color Xiaomi 13 Pro.

Xiaomi 13 Pro — Good exposure, vivid colors. Oppo Find X3 Pro. Vivo X Pro.

Xiaomi 13 Pro. Summary Scores Specifications. Cons Struggles to capture the instant in challenging conditions like backlit scenes or low light Exposure instabilities in high contrast scenes Not suitable for audio recording of loud sources such as concerts and shows Lack of display readability under sunlight Poor autonomy when device is in idle with the screen off. Overall Camera Score i. Photo i. Bokeh i. Preview i.

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. In addition, the camera was capable of producing high image quality at close and medium range tele settings and recorded still images with a wide dynamic range, even in low light. The 13 Pro camera has some similar hardware to the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, but there are a few differences to note. Both models have Leica-branded lens and the Leica color modes.

Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

Xiaomi 13 Pro. Summary Scores Specifications. Cons Struggles to capture the instant in challenging conditions like backlit scenes or low light Exposure instabilities in high contrast scenes Not suitable for audio recording of loud sources such as concerts and shows Lack of display readability under sunlight Poor autonomy when device is in idle with the screen off. Overall Camera Score i. Photo i. Bokeh i. Preview i. Zoom i. Video i.

Macbook pro 2009 weight

Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Snapdragon. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G. Overall Audio Score i. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra emphasized natural detail instead of sharpening and ringing. On several occasions, the right moment was missed, with the camera capturing the image either too soon or too late. Texture rendering in video mode was accurate in most conditions, especially under daylight where fine detail was preserved nicely. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. Xiaomi 13 Ultra — Authentic mode — darker exposure, noticeable vignetting. Motorola Moto G62 5G. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Exynos. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations.

The focal length of the tele is slightly shorter than on the 12S Ultra, which in our tests predictably resulted in lower image quality at long-range tele settings. Google Pixel 4a. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra. Xiaomi 13 Pro - Loss of fine detail. Google Pixel 6. Honor X7. Oppo Find X6 Pro. Oppo Reno8 5G. Oppo Find X3 Neo. Honor Magic5 Pro - Fine details visible.